Moises Rupinski: NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN AN ELECTRON.
Guy Bonamico: well, that's quite a mouthful. I define science as follows;... "the purpose of science is to reduce all subjective perceptions to objective ones and thereby coerce everyone's agreement as to what is "real" and what is not. It is therefore a materialist philosophy". In other words science tries to erase all subjectivity, and subjectivity is how we initally percieve the world. Science tries to change our perceptions therefore from our own self determinism to other-determinism (ie, someone else's perceptions). Have you ever wondered that ALL electrons are identical in structure (while not necessarily being all at the same energy level).... why is this , when we observe that virtually everything which pretends to be a perfect duplicate of another thing is in fact not so ?. The same is true for atoms but beyond atoms the rule collapses. How do we explain the "merging" of objects such as with the 'Ei! nstein-Bose Condensate...'. Indeed , how do we explain any of the observed poltergeist phenomena, including levitation,. merging, re-location (teleportation). invisibility, and so on, etc.. The universe actually is a lot more subjective then we are permitted to discover. These phenomena would also include the very bizarre such as with seeing reflections in mirrors when the object does not exsist or NOT seeing objects in the mirror when they should be there ? Einstein himself avoided quantum physics, saying it was too "spooky". In my book I explani many of these phenomena via a genuine new form of energy. It is the result of 27 years research in physics, quantum physics, relativuity, cosmology, astrophysics, electronics, metaphysics and the paranormal. The paranormal wqs included since it is seen to be simply quantum physics operating at the mundane level. It is the essence of "mind over matter". The book represents a totally new paradigm in physics and technology as you! may imagine. In cidentally I do also explain what electrons! are and what they are made of; I also explain electricity. Under special Electrons can manifest in pairs and even groups. they can also revert back and forth between particulate and wave phenomena while in the conductor. I expalni the essential differences between the two main divisions of the Em spectrum > wave and particle, and what creates this division and how particles are formed. These chapters represent only a very small part of my four volume work.. No mind-bending mathematics; it is written for the layman. naturally when discussing subjects concerning 'mind over matter', religion and philosophy will inevitably enter thr fray. The main point of the book is the description of the energy form andf how it may be generated using a special electronic technology which I also expalin. The title is 'A NEW FORM OF ENERGY; ITS DESCRIPTION; ITS GENERATION; AND ITS APPLICATIONS' (Amazon).SEE... www,energyandphysicsatotalbreakthrough.com...Show more
Daria Verfailli! e: The properties of the electron have been extensively MEASURED for almost 150 years. A photograph is not the only way to detect something. Electrons do more than just conduct electricity in metals. They're used in x-ray generators, cathode ray tubes, electron beam welding, electron microscopes, electron beam lithography, and skin cancer therapies. The existence of the electron is also critical to the theory behind atoms and atomic bonding, and we have seen atoms: http://newscenter.lbl.gov/press-releases/2009/03/2...Scientists were able to measure the mass of electrons as early as 1896. At the same time they measured the charge and determined that the charge to mass ratio was independent of the material used to generate the electrons, indicating that they were a distinct particle. There is immense amounts of observational data supporting the existence of the electron. I'm sorry that your science education was so poor that you think a photograph is the only way to establish! that something exists....Show more
Ayesha Genova: A couple thing! s about science which differentiate it from religion... Science continues to evolve and regularly demonstrates that "beliefs" about the universe can change when someone comes up with a better explanation. It is important to understand that scientists (at least most) recognize that there are limitations to what we know now and there is ALWAYS the opportunity to learn things we did not know before. Science is not biased to the most popular theory being the only one that is "correct" (although scientists, being human, are subject to biases of all types and are subject to making mistakes and having dishonorable intentions and selective observations and self-fulfilling prophecies, etc.). Science has a very good (not perfect) track record of correcting itself. On your electron example... Yes, no one has seen an electron. Given that what we can "see" is limited to visible light, this is not particularly problematic to our theories explaining the behavior of electrons (whi! ch we can measure in quite fine detail). I believe it was Einstein who said: if you can't explain something to a five year old, maybe you don't understand it very well. I think this applies to the field of quantum mechanics....Show more
Bernie Cerra: this is totally no longer likely those matters will die out devoid of government. Human ingenuity and interest for the sake of technological information will sustain them as they have constantly executed (Newton and Einstein weren't precisely lifelong government workers). it is going to additionally help that investigating those issues will rather much easily yield much extra revelations which will strengthen our technologies, fairly advice technologies.
Lawana Neemann: You need to do a little more science.An electron is much better and more fully explained in equations than in words.Quantum, while counter-intuitive, explains the computer chips that make your post possible.I'm afraid you're making large claims ou! t of small knowledge.I'm not attacking you, I'm encouraging you to lear! n more....Show more
Andrew Sinatra: Your inability to understand a concept does not constitute evidence that that concept does not exist.
Francisco Schonhardt: theoretical science is about explaining empirical results.It's as simple as that.no-one has seen an electron, but we can predict its behaviour incredibly well, so the current theory seems to be doing pretty well.
David Kuper: So, scientists cannot use words to discuss various realities until after those realities are fully understood? How will they ever be understood if scientists don't discuss various hypotheses?
